28 Comments
Dec 14, 2021Liked by Robert B. Hubbell

Forms of exhaustion abound in the people who have been standing up to (paying attention to) the systemic, legalized cruelty of some of our leaders during the pandemic.

Two thoughts come about this exhaustion.

One: That a good deal of the transgressions we are living through and are witnessing cause moral injuries. These transgressions are actions and positions that we had thought were beyond the pale, that no civilized, reasonable, people, would ever do those things. But we are far past the belief that we have shared standards of decency, and honesty. When we watch people with political power, such as our former president, and current governors Greg Abbott and Ron DeSantis, lie to their people and mandate policies which undoubtedly result in deaths during this pandemic.

Those of us who watch the news, or read newspapers have no doubt that people are and have been dying because of the policies of some leaders during the pandemic.

Aside from the horrific number of deaths caused, the stressing of our medical system, and many other quantifiable effects, invisible damage is also done. I call this invisible harm a moral injury. It is a moral injury to see wrong being done, legally, in an ongoing way. And to not see enough being done to stop it.

Moral injuries unbalance our sense that the world we live in is basically good. They bruise our trust that we will continue as a “good enough” nation.

Two: Those people in power, like our former president and the two governors mentioned above, who made certain that some of the people whom they govern would die and will die, those ones who are causing moral injury, are holding the people of their states, and all the rest of us Americans who are witnesses to this, under a moral siege.

A siege is a strategy of war.

Laying siege is a starving and exhausting of a trapped population, over time. The trapped people are forced through fear and deprivation to capitulate or surrender.

This moral siege is intended to demonstrate the power and intentions of those leaders. And it is also meant to discourage those being led by them, from believing that their leaders care about their well-being.

What I am calling moral injury and moral siege are not new to our country. Indigenous peoples and people of color, as well as women of every color, know moral injury and moral siege intimately.

Expand full comment

Very well said. I am surrounded by friends and family who are numb at this point. I am trying to imagine what horror could activate them. They are wonderful people, all. They agree with us politically. They think TFG is unspeakably disgusting - they agree that he attempted a coup and is responsible for thousands of deaths. Yet they are numb. Exhausted and feeling helpless.

I rant and rave about the loss of life and the crumbling of our nation's democracy. They hear me but don't - eyes glazed over with fatigue and helplessness.

I need these wonderful people in my life. So I relent. Perhaps they will become "activists" at some point. Maybe they will find their rage again. For now, it just means that I must pick up the slack. I must abandon some of my other pleasures and projects and add more hours to writing and emailing and texting to our leaders. It IS a moral thing. It's not just "politics". It's a war for the soul of a nation, the future of the planet and all that inhabit it. It is beyond an emergency. It is as if the big asteroid is headed for Earth.

We can't lose. We owe it to the generations to follow. Correction....that may follow.

Expand full comment
author

Bill, if everyone had your attitude of determination, we would prevail in the near term. Please spread your determination and confidence to others!

Expand full comment
author

Hi, Pam. Your statement above is insightful and helpful in explaining why people feel so exhausted, angry, and bewildered by what is happening to us. I may use some of it in tonight’s newsletter. Thank you.

Expand full comment

I am never so exalted as when I am persecuted, or similar words to that effect. Roe vs Wade is one of the most important generational markers in the fight for human rights, but it isn’t the only one, and many of us were born into a world without it. Last night I watched a documentary on “1917”, the darkest year of World War One. Multiply the number of Covid deaths by five or six, and you have the casualty numbers for just that year of the war. Get the cameras off of Manchin and help Stacey Abrams win; increase our margin in the House and Senate; refuse to be drawn in to fear, intimidation, and retaliation: these are actions to which I can dedicate myself. We shall overcome.

Expand full comment
author

Agreed 100%!

Expand full comment

I believe the Supreme Court of the United States of the 21st century is dismantling democracy itself.

Three things:

1. Citizens United amendment making money "free speech" making it legalized bribery to buy our elected officials. They are now voting 95% of the time with their donors not their constituents.

2. The 2013 gutting of the Voting Rights act that they decided was not necessary any more. In particular taking out the pre-clearance clause giving states carte blanche to suppress voters and gerrymander the districts to the hilt. States rights are not absolute even for the originalists of the Constitution who gave Congress the right to curb rogue state taking away voting rights.

3. This ruling taking away women's rights and installing the supremacy of states rights and super majority legislatures to install autocracy over EXISTING Constitutional Rights. That they are taking away rights based on a future reading of the law is abhorrent. That the rule of law is also obliterated and replaced by vigilante injustice means all rights are at stake.

The Supreme Court is illegitimate because of then Majority leader McConnell's double shenanigans first refusing to even hear the Merrick Garland nomination a year from the election and then pushing through the nomination of Amy Barrett even after early voting had started. If there hadn't been contempt of the Constitution by Grim Reaper McConnell, who has been bought by monied interests, we wouldn't have a super majority far right court.

I'll go further and say both Justices Kavanaugh and Thomas should be recused on any law involving women's rights since they have been credibly accused of violating women's rights although justice has never been served on them.

So, I'm looking to see if impeachment is a tool Congress (which is so corrupt) could use to pull the Supreme Court back from destroying democracy and having them enforce the Guarantee Clause of the Constitution saying it is guaranteed that all states must have a republican form of government, i.e. represented by the people. Adding more seats to the Court is at best a kluggy temporary fix. The answer may be in terms limits when each member of the court gets a nine year term and one rotates off the court each year.

For now, we have an illegitimate Supreme Court in Contempt of the Constitution and set on destroying democracy altogether. I'm going to write to Justice Sotomayor and Chief Justice Roberts about this. They have staff that read all letters sent them. Here's how: https://legalbeagle.com/5704017-write-supreme-court-justices.html Time to remove the stench of the current rogue court. We the People, all of us this time!

Expand full comment
author

Hi, you covered a lot and I agree with almost everything you say. But I note that expanding the court requires only a majority vote in both chambers of Congress. Imposing term limits would require a constitutional amendment and the approval of 38 state legislatures. I doubt that will ever happen. So we should focus on what is possible even if sub optimal. I would add that Justice Gorsuch should resign in view of the fact that he occupies an illegitimate seat on the court. The standard for impeachment of a Justice is the same for is same for a president: a 2/3 vote to convict in the senate. Again, I doubt that will happen.

Expand full comment

"... shall hold their offices during good behaviour,.." Justice Gorsuch will never resign of his own volition. One must prove bad behaviour through impeachment which is now toothless in a divided two-party system run by big money -- an oligarchic kleptocracy rather than a democracy. I agree with John Adams that a two-party system would be the worst evil to befall the Constitution. Maybe Congress should pass a law REDUCING the number of Justices on the Supreme Court say to 7 -- with the interpretation of getting rid of the last two perhaps. ... Just a thought process to open up options to consider. We can't stop resisting even if there is little chance of changing things easily.

Expand full comment
founding

Cathy, I can appreciate your desire to be rid of some of our justices but R.Hubbell’s point is and has been that we must look to Congress and legislative measures. Impeachment, like amending the constitution would take decades. Recall the ERA. It should have been adopted as part of our constitution. And, I have often noted to friends that during 45 years of my 78 years we have experienced four of five impeachments or impeachment attempts in the country’s 225 year history - all to no avail expect for a heightened partisanship turned ugly with the ascent of DJT and his cohort of insurrectionists. We must see the urgency of the moment, attempt to pass an expanded court or dig in to get out the vote up and down the ballot in 2022. These are our choices. We can do it with faith in our fellow citizens and hard work.

Expand full comment

Right on!

Expand full comment
Dec 14, 2021Liked by Robert B. Hubbell

I'm close enough to my end of days, that I have stopped thinking in terms of seeing or participating in a nation where all women have the rights to their own bodies. Instead I take great hope in a generation of women who have never lived before RvW and have come to expect their reproductive rights. These women (and men) will fight hard to protect what they have come to take for granted. It is far easier to deny rights people have not yet experienced, than to take them away after those rights have been established. People don't like change. When changes come to reproductive rights, this next generation will fight back. I trust our future to them. We must encourage and teach these strong young people and support them every way we can.

Expand full comment
author

Agree!

Expand full comment
founding

Excellent! Well stated. Now, let’s get that new generation to the polls in 2022 and beyond. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Dec 14, 2021Liked by Robert B. Hubbell

I think the point that Manchin voted for the defense budget with no concerns about inflation and yet is holding up Build Back Better on that premise is such an important point to keep in the public eye. I also appreciate the consistently positive messaging we receive on the Hubbell newsletter - we have to take a long view to achieve progressive change. Demoralization is our enemy. I also want to say as a subscriber that I did not receive my newsletter today in my email feed but instead had to google the newsletter in order to access it. Please put me back on distribution as I just subscribed in the past few months and read your newsletter first thing every AM as it appears in my email.

Expand full comment
author

Hi, Patsy. You are still on the list. Please check your spam / junk folders. Depending on your email interface, it might also be in your “other” or “promotions” inbox. You can prevent this in the future by add roberthubbell@substack.com to your “safe sender” list. To do so, find the last newsletter that I made it into your inbox, click on it, then find the “never block sender” or “mark as safe sender” option on the menu bar at the top.

Expand full comment
founding
Dec 14, 2021Liked by Robert B. Hubbell

Having lived through the time before Roe vs. Wade, I suspect the same thing will happen now with women's reproductive health. There will be an underground movement to help women in their need. At least now there are better means of helping women than the wire coat hanger. Drugs are easy to conceal, and the main thing you have to worry about is sharp-eyed, nosy Republican neighbors.

Expand full comment
founding
Dec 14, 2021Liked by Robert B. Hubbell

Can't agree with you that Justice Gorsuch's dissent was "well said." He was just wrong. The courts have long held that religious objections cannot overcome the need of the public at large for protection against deadly infectious diseases. There is no organized religion--not Christian Science, not the Seventh Day Adventists, none--that opposes the coronavirus vaccine. Particularly for those in public health, there simply is no right to threaten the lives of others through a preventable infectious disease. If you feel that you have that right, find another line of work. As for the Fourteenth Amendment, as we have discussed, the forces of darkness are trying to repeal it though the courts.

Expand full comment
author

Hi, you make several interesting points. While I don't agree with Justice gorsuch's dissent, he makes the point that the 1st amendment protects not only organized religions, but privately held religious beliefs. Indeed, he notes that the Pope says it is OK for catholics to be vaccinated. So, although the leaders of the Catholic Church and the 7th day adventists may say that vaccinations are acceptable, individual members of those religions can find protection under the 1st amendment according to Justice gorsuch. Well I think he is wrong in his dissent, if he had applied the same level of scrutiny to the Texas Anti-abortion law, the outcome in the Texas decision would have been different.

Expand full comment
Dec 14, 2021Liked by Robert B. Hubbell

I am hoping that between voter suppression and the attack on reproductive Health there will be so many angry people of color and women who will get out to vote just because they are so angry. And we can’t forget those who are not people of color and women who are still angry because of these issues and will hopefully turn out to vote in droves.

Expand full comment
author

Norma, I share your hope. If this assault on reproductive freedom will not stir people, it is difficult to see what will.

Expand full comment
founding

Amen! But wait, wouldn’t we expect January 6 has already stirred people - followed by the incredible gaslighting attempts to rewrite history? Every vote since has shown there is no R beyond Reps. Cheney and Kinzinger who has the moral courage to stand up to Trump and McConnell’s dark money that is shaping their disgraceful behavior.

Expand full comment
Dec 14, 2021Liked by Robert B. Hubbell

Lyndon would have said “You are right Senator Manchin. And I am going to close or move all the federal offices in SC to keep that inflation under control “

Expand full comment
Dec 14, 2021Liked by Robert B. Hubbell

Robert- Sorry, I'm terse to fault. My point was, I don't foresee a long runway for our democracy. We like to think that it was ordained by god, but I don't think it is going to be the first civilization/culture/nation to persist. We are finding out that democracy requires a certain amount of knowledge, long-term thinking and, maybe above all, cooperation. These things are in short supply these days and I see that only getting worse. Most liberals try to see around the corner and plan for our the benefit of our descendants but it will take a preponderance of the population to move the ball at all. (so much for my being terse)

Expand full comment
author

Okay, thanks for the clarification. A lot to unpack there, so I will reflect on it.

Expand full comment

This is exhausting, but the more creepy the insurrection information and the attacks on Roe vs Wade become, the more disgusted I become at the thought of having self-righteous and corrupt bullies trying to boss us around. Attacks on the Capitol and legislators are criminal. Depriving women of proper and private healthcare and choice in childbearing is, in my mind, both criminal and sadistic.

Expand full comment

Sadly, the number of "new generations Americans" is a small and shrinking number. Lets be realistic.

Expand full comment
author

Hi, David. I'm not certain I follow your point. It is true that population growth is declining in America. But that is true across-the-board, except for immigration. Immigrants tend to is to vote democratic, on average. So if we're being realistic, over time, demographic change will move the majority of Americans towards more liberal

and tolerant policies. They will also be more likely to support reproductive rights.

Expand full comment