“...do we really want hundreds of election officials unilaterally deciding to omit candidates from the ballot under the Disqualification Clause?” In a word, YES. Anything to remove the orange stain from the fabric of our nation.
Regarding the question of whether Sect. III is self-enforcing: Seems to me that if a candidate is denied a place on the ballot by unilateral act of an election official, that candidate can then go to court to argue the illegality of their exclusion. Thus, they get their due process. Requiring Congress to pass some implementing legislation seems to add an extra layer unnecessarily. Such legislation may give another layer of legal "cover" to the election official, but in the end the politician denied ballot access will go to court to test its validity.
I have had occasion to be at trial (divorce) for days. Initially, listening to attorneys hammer out evidentiary details drove me bonkers. Wasn't the truth "obvious"?
Well no, for a stranger it really wasn't.
I learned four things from that experience:
1) Evidence is all about building a coherent and compelling story. It takes time and dogged persistence. It is laborious.
2) It is ALWAYS possible to construct an alternative view of the facts. That's why #1 is so crucial.
3) It is imperative that one have not simply good tactics, but a long-term strategy to anticipate future possible events. No matter how improbable an outcome is, be ready for it.
4) Never assume that your truth will be seen as THE truth. This can be heartbreaking, but it is reality.
-----
Today's Newsletter is a perfect demonstration. You really got my attention with your two assertions:
1) Trump will be in pretrial custody. Period.
[Robert, seldom are you this straightforward about a future event. (!)]
2) No matter what anyone argues, in the context of Section 3 there is simply no clear path to prevent Trump from running and holding office again.
I felt momentarily deflated but then remembered my 4 points.
Thank you for teaching us and for infusing your message with love and hope.
Thank you, Robert! I have been looking for a clear answer re tfg not being eligible to run. The argument that he is automatically not eligible never made sense to me (because it lacks due process). Thank you again. Happy anniversary. Enjoy your time in one of my favorite places.
I don't know whether to laugh or to cry when I hear Donald Trump once again, now after his indictment in Georgia, pathetically screaming: "Election interference!" - Exactly. Does the man not see the irony in all of this? Or . . . does he simply have no shame?
Happy happy anniversary!! Thanks to both of you for keeping your readers up-to-date and well informed. Today’s newsletter was an especially outstanding call to reason and the rule of law.
OKAY, so I left a comment earlier that I live in Montana and proud of our "youngins'."
In today's news The Yellowstone Club, an exclusive ski & golf community near Yellowstone, is polluting the rivers. This is the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th home for some of the world's richest people and philanthopists. It's one thing to have a home here. But do not come into my backyard and pollute it. You "people" are polluting the headwaters of the Missouri River. You do not have special privileges. And Kevin Costner, hopefully you realize with your tv show which reaps you millions of $$ is raising the rents & housing for many of my friends and neighbors in Montana. Some of my friends who do not own a home are finding themselves priced out of rentals in my home of Missoula. True: one of my friends rent is going from $1300/month to $2000/month. $8400/year increase...I know...life is tough, but it doesn't have to be that difficult for people who have helped build this state and infrastructure.
“...do we really want hundreds of election officials unilaterally deciding to omit candidates from the ballot under the Disqualification Clause?” In a word, YES. Anything to remove the orange stain from the fabric of our nation.
Happy Anniversary. Thank you both for keeping us informed on what is up....
Regarding the question of whether Sect. III is self-enforcing: Seems to me that if a candidate is denied a place on the ballot by unilateral act of an election official, that candidate can then go to court to argue the illegality of their exclusion. Thus, they get their due process. Requiring Congress to pass some implementing legislation seems to add an extra layer unnecessarily. Such legislation may give another layer of legal "cover" to the election official, but in the end the politician denied ballot access will go to court to test its validity.
Happy Anniversary and congratulations on marrying such a wonderful partner!
Happy anniversary, you too! And this is as good a time as any to thank you again for all you do.
I have only one thing to say about your comment "Accept this fact: Trump will be imprisoned awaiting his J6 trial":
From your mouth to God's ears!😜
Should have said, "you two"!
Unless the defendant is really rich they will face huge costs:
Do the math:
For each defendant in the Georgia RICO case:
If they have one lead lawyer at $1200/hr, and three lawyers at $700 per hour
If two lawyers attend 90 days of trial and bill for 10 hours each day
If the three cheaper lawyers do legal research/evidence review for 60 days for 8 hours each day
If the lead lawyer does 80 hours of research/trial preparation,
The Price is $2,814,000.
Happy Anniversary. I'll bet your wife would say what she is is because of you, too. Happy when a couple is so connected. Much aloha to you both.
I have had occasion to be at trial (divorce) for days. Initially, listening to attorneys hammer out evidentiary details drove me bonkers. Wasn't the truth "obvious"?
Well no, for a stranger it really wasn't.
I learned four things from that experience:
1) Evidence is all about building a coherent and compelling story. It takes time and dogged persistence. It is laborious.
2) It is ALWAYS possible to construct an alternative view of the facts. That's why #1 is so crucial.
3) It is imperative that one have not simply good tactics, but a long-term strategy to anticipate future possible events. No matter how improbable an outcome is, be ready for it.
4) Never assume that your truth will be seen as THE truth. This can be heartbreaking, but it is reality.
-----
Today's Newsletter is a perfect demonstration. You really got my attention with your two assertions:
1) Trump will be in pretrial custody. Period.
[Robert, seldom are you this straightforward about a future event. (!)]
2) No matter what anyone argues, in the context of Section 3 there is simply no clear path to prevent Trump from running and holding office again.
I felt momentarily deflated but then remembered my 4 points.
Thank you for teaching us and for infusing your message with love and hope.
It
Takes
Time.
Happy anniversary to both of you!
Thank you, Robert! I have been looking for a clear answer re tfg not being eligible to run. The argument that he is automatically not eligible never made sense to me (because it lacks due process). Thank you again. Happy anniversary. Enjoy your time in one of my favorite places.
Adding my voice to the congratulations:
Happy Anniversary, newlyweds! May your love and cooperation prosper for at least another 42 years.
I don't know whether to laugh or to cry when I hear Donald Trump once again, now after his indictment in Georgia, pathetically screaming: "Election interference!" - Exactly. Does the man not see the irony in all of this? Or . . . does he simply have no shame?
Happy 42nd anniversary! I wish you and your managing editor good health and many more years together!
Happy happy anniversary!! Thanks to both of you for keeping your readers up-to-date and well informed. Today’s newsletter was an especially outstanding call to reason and the rule of law.
OKAY, so I left a comment earlier that I live in Montana and proud of our "youngins'."
In today's news The Yellowstone Club, an exclusive ski & golf community near Yellowstone, is polluting the rivers. This is the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th home for some of the world's richest people and philanthopists. It's one thing to have a home here. But do not come into my backyard and pollute it. You "people" are polluting the headwaters of the Missouri River. You do not have special privileges. And Kevin Costner, hopefully you realize with your tv show which reaps you millions of $$ is raising the rents & housing for many of my friends and neighbors in Montana. Some of my friends who do not own a home are finding themselves priced out of rentals in my home of Missoula. True: one of my friends rent is going from $1300/month to $2000/month. $8400/year increase...I know...life is tough, but it doesn't have to be that difficult for people who have helped build this state and infrastructure.
Happy Anniversary. The managing editor ? She who must be obeyed? I love it - especially as a 78 year old newly wed.
Best, Janet